Public denouncements of abusive psychiatric drugging are becoming a daily matter in the mass media. Witness the last “Your Turn” TV show with Kathy Fountain. The topic, “Too Many Kids on Drugs?” is harshly debated between Kathy and 4 Guests:  

• Peter Breggin, M.D. author Medication Madness
• Bruce Levine, Ph.D.   Psychologist
• Dominick Riccio, Ph.D. Psychologist 
• James B. Gottstein, attorney  

I strongly invite you to watch these 3 video clips - a total of 22 minutes. Click on the links below and see for yourself. Spread the word and share the vision!!! We need to educate parents on the truth behind child medication.

Your American kids have 3 times more chances to be wrongly medicated by a psychiatrist than in Europe. American kids “consume” 5 times more Ritalin than all other countries combined! See the theory of brain chemical imbalance being destroyed by experts. See how parents can help their overly active children naturally, without any drugs!

#1 Video: 8-1/2 minutes

#2 Video: 7-1/2 minutes 

#3 Video: 6 minutes

25, 529 signatures against TeenScreen. Petition:

The chain of tragic school shootings is now also spreading over to churches. This is a terrible trend. Not only does this shooting have NOTHING to do with what the Unitarian church in Tenessee teaches, but it it totally out of context, totally unpredicted, and just tragically wrong.

Will the media report what causes these tragic shootings? These antidepressant psychotropic drugs can have terribly dangerous side effects, as shown on this black-box-label warning that is enclosed with many of them:

For all recent school shootings and mall shootings there were psychotropic drugs at work. All school shooters were on a combination of strong psychotropic drugs and/or on the withdrawal symptoms from those.

It is just too likely that this church shooting also is linked to psychotropic drugs, drugs that are so strong they can make people go berserk. It will be interesting to see if the Pharma spin-control will be on site fast enough to control the news.  We may only hear that the shooter was on medication, but never be told what psychotropic drugs he was on. Or maybe it will be blamed on video games again.

 Loading …

As Oprah mentioned in her latest interview with Tom Cruise in Telluride, Tom Cruise drew a lot of criticism for calling psychiatry a pseudoscience on TV with Matt Lauer, and in actual fact this resulted in a steady stream of controversy in the media.The psychiatric industry supporters were calling Tom Cruise not scientific and were trying to discredit him, of course in order to safeguard their own vested interests. It appears that they succeeded to a large extent. Now here is a piece of news that will probably never make it into the large mainstream media, but it is probably more important than all the controversy stirred up by the psychiatric industry:

Institute of Medicine finds that none of the psychiatric posttraumatic stress disorder drugs actually work.

The Institute of medicine recently launched an independent review of 90 clinical scientific studies into the use of using psychiatric drugs in order to treat posttraumatic stress disorder. He is the stunning secret, that will probably never make it into the news: none of these 90 clinical studies could demonstrate that any of the psychiatric drugs and was any more effective in treating posttraumatic stress disorder than your average sugar pill, the placebo used in those studies.

Which is the pseudoscience?

I think it is just shocking that the industry gets a way with lying and cheating like that. They’re people are taking tablets that have all sorts of side effects at huge expense at medical risk, yet the supposed disease that they are supposedly treating, can be treated just as good by taking sugar tablets. This is definitely the very worst thing I’ve ever seen. I believe pseudoscience is actually a euphemism for that type of money driven operation. Tom Cruise was actually too kind to the psychiatrists when he called them pseudoscience, I think harsher words are even more appropriate.

What do YOU think?

 Loading …

CALL TO ACTION:

The supporters of The MOTHERS Act have been engaging for the past few years in an aggressive attempt to pass an incredibly broad federal law which will transform the U.S. market for “antidepressant” or “antipsychotic” drugs from a voluntary pool of patients who are encouraged by commercials to seek help from their doctors, to a government-sponsored screening program to select patients who are deemed to need “antidepressant” or “antipsychotic” drugs from among the female childbearing-age population. These promoters of the bill have had vast resources and ample time to obtain support and backing from the legislators they have influenced. The bill has passed the U.S. House, and needs approval from the Senate, final agreement from the House if any changes are made, and a signature from President Bush. This could happen in a matter of days or weeks.

The timing of the impending vote on this bill in the U.S. Senate is highly ironic in light of the tremendous amount of negative news we have seen on antidepressants and antipsychotics over the past several months. It is especially shocking to see it being promoted at a time when our society is being terrified by frequent shootings and murder-suicides which have been preceded by the perpetrator’s use and sometimes improper discontinuation of antidepressant drugs, and in the wake of several notable celebrities’ deaths which were the result of prescription drug toxicity. The evidence against these drugs is frightening, and the reality is that, if The MOTHERS Act is passed, those who are the most innocent and vulnerable and in need of protection FROM these drugs will instead be put ON these drugs, and placed in serious danger from all of the negative drug effects - including spontaneous abortion, a tenfold increased risk of psychosis for postpartum women, birth defects, suicide, and homicide (YES, THIS IS A LISTED ANTIDEPRESSANT SIDE EFFECT).

The bill creates funding for development of new drugs at taxpayers’ expense. Doctors will be under greater pressure to prescribe drugs to pregnant and postpartum women due to federal law which would ensure the promotion of earlier “detection” and “treatment.” Despite the fact that the law admits that the causes of depression or psychosis can vary between many life situations and social realities, and perhaps some unknown biological factors, and the manufacturers’ own research (kept hidden for years but recently revealed) shows that antidepressants have no more benefit than a sugar pill, the bill endorses drugs and hospitalization as essential and necessary treatment options. Many women who seek treatment or reach out for help under this proposed legislation would be under the watchful eyes of the government rather than simply under the care and guidance of their doctors or counselors. The potential for creating violence, death, and destroying families through the administration of drugs combined with possible involvement of police, CPS, and the courts, as well as the invasions of privacy and individual freedoms that this bill would ensure, must not be accepted.

Since we first issued our press release opposing S. 1375, The MOTHERS Act on February 11, thousands of people have been made aware of this bill, which at one time flew way under the public radar. Many people have come forward for the first time with sad stories of personal harm caused by the drugs, while a few others have, unfortunately, gone on to continue their support for a bill that threatens to bring about a dire and dangerous situation, sacrificing life, family, children, motherhood, freedom, and our future.

Some people pushing for the bill have taken notice of our efforts, and in response simply told the public and the media that The MOTHERS Act is mainly about “education.” That sounds so innocuous and harmless that it’s nearly impossible for most people to disagree with the bill if they have not read its contents. But even if that were the true purpose, or if the Senate were to rewrite the bill and remove most of the negative wording, leaving ONLY education as its goal, let us consider this idea for a moment - what is the impact of an education or awareness campaign promoting certain psychiatric labels?

In a 1996 study cited by Dr. Grace Jackson in her book, Rethinking Psychiatric Drugs, researchers discovered that an awareness campaign in the UK called “Defeat Depression” resulted in a significant increase in prescriptions for antidepressants, a change in physician practices of increased willingness to prescribe, and a large increase in agreement from the public that antidepressant drugs are effective and should be given to patients. Furthermore, to summarize from a follow-up study in 2001, researchers concluded that since there were still so many people who favored alternative treatments such as yoga, meditation and natural remedies over antidepressants, “further efforts to improve public knowledge about pharmacotherapy of mental disorders [were] needed.”
 
Would passing The MOTHERS Act in effect counter the ideas of those who have wised up to the drug companies, by creating a sense of legitimacy through governmental drug endorsements? By promoting earlier detection and treatment of postpartum depression or psychosis, or depression in pregnancy, it makes sense that we would see the numbers of prescriptions for antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs significantly increase in pregnant and postpartum women. This would be a boon to the drug industry, which has had to deal with the potential for decreasing sales since the FDA issued black box warnings on SSRIs for doubling the risk of suicide in 2004, and black box warnings on “antipsychotic” drugs for doubling suicides just a few weeks ago. Eli Lilly received a “Not Approvable” letter for their new injectable Zyprexa application several days ago. Also, a recent analysis of all studies submitted to the FDA prior to approval of many antidepressant drugs showed that the drugs overall were no more effective than placebo, but that most of the studies in which antidepressants did worse than placebo were never made public, or the results were misreported.

With the truth stacked against the drugs and against this bill, we have no option other than to campaign vigorously against the passage of The MOTHERS Act. There are many steps you can take right now to help ensure its defeat and safeguard our women, unborn babies, and the innocent bystanders whose paths sometimes cross people who commit crimes during altered states while under the influence of prescription drugs.

First, sign our petition against the MOTHERS Act http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/stop-the-dangerous-and-invasive-mothers-act

Next, contact the U.S. Senate and demand that they consider the truth and stop this bill dead in its tracks. For phone and fax numbers for the Senate please go to http://uniteforlife.org/senatecontactlist.htm

Please share this information with everyone you possibly can and urge them to act now.

Please also read the addendum to this press release, especially the excerpts which follow the links, and feel free to forward this entire information packet.

Sincerely,

Amy Philo
Founder, http://www.uniteforlife.org/
Co-Founder, http://www.chaada.org/  
Survivor of Zoloft-induced homicidality, suicidality, and psychosis during the postpartum period

Camille Milke
Founder, http://www.copesfoundation.com/ ,
New Mexico State Director of the ICFDA (http://www.drugawareness.org/home.html )
Mother of a victim of psychiatric drug-induced suicide and grandmother to a now motherless child

Dr. Ann Blake Tracy
Executive Director of the ICFDA
(http://www.drugawareness.org/home.html )
Author of Prozac: Pancaea or Pandora? Our Serotonin Nightmare

======================================
Addendum

Blog and YouTube channel for Julie, whose son, Manie, was born with a life-threatening Paxil heart defect (Julie has 5 kids, 4 of whom are healthy, but she took Paxil during her pregnancy with Manie, her 4^th child)
http://www.bigpharmavictim.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/jledgi
Moms in NJ (which has a similar law to the proposed MOTHERS Act) were treated like criminals for seeking help for PPD http://www.uniteforlife.org/ppdcriminals.htm

Our original press release with an addendum, which includes references to medical studies on dangers, including pregnancy dangers and suicide / homicide dangers, toxicity dangers, and articles on PPD alternatives, actual safely treatable causes, and prevention:

http://www.uniteforlife.org/MOTHERpress.htm

A lack of sufficient data to support the alleged safety of breastfeeding while using psychiatric drugs http://www.uniteforlife.org/breastfeeding.html
A decline in suicides since the FDA Black Box Warning http://www.uniteforlife.org/decline%20in%20sucicides.html

Lowest level of suicides in 30 years as prescriptions for antidepressants drop by half (England, Wales) http://www.uniteforlife.org/englandwales.htm
A Swedish study revealing that psychiatric drug use preceded about 80% of all adult suicides
http://ahrp.blogspot.com/2008/03/antidepressants-linked-to-52-of.html

Antipsychotic drugs get slapped with black box warning for doubling suicides http://www.uniteforlife.org/socalledmoodstabilizersdoublesuicide.htm

Adrenal exhaustion as a cause of PPD (including information about thyroid conditions and the fact that antidepressants exacerbate adrenal problems): http://www.uniteforlife.org/adrenalppd.htm

Media coverage of the NEJM analysis revealing the data suppression and ineffectiveness of antidepressants http://www.uniteforlife.org/suppresseddata.htm

Flyer to use for massive advertising against the bill and to solicit petition signatures http://www.uniteforlife.org/flyermom.htm

An outreach letter that can be used for emails asking for support and endorsements of our efforts against this bill http://www.uniteforlife.org/requestforhelp.htm

Amy Philo’s YouTube Videos including her personal story of Zoloft-induced psychosis and homicidal and suicidal urges during the postpartum period:

atracyphd1@aol.com , 801-209-1800 direct, 801-335-4727 fax

Camille Milke at sarinasvoice@aol.com  
505-269-2286 direct or 505-213-0999 fax
http://www.copesfoundation.com/ , http://www.drugawareness.org/home.html

You HAVE GOT to listen to this. Unbelievable what they pass off as science today:

http://www.naturalnews.com/podcasts/HRR007.mp3

As a result of public criticism and many class action lawsuits, the psychiatric pharma industry has been having a lot of stress recently, and many of the big pharma companies have reduced their workforce by 10% in the last year.

But instead of handling that stress by taking their own antidepressant medications, they have resorted to lashing out at critics via powerful PR middlemen. For example, this has resulted in anti-PR campaigns agains Tom Cruise.

The question is: Who is right? Big Psycho-Pharma with their black-PR hounds or Tom Cruise with calling them a pseudoscience?

Here is a shocking experiment that has been completely forgotten:

http://hermannstrijewski.forhumanrights.org/IMIT_files/ThudExperiment.flv

The above video clip is an excerpt of the BBC Documentary The Trap.

The number of school shootings is continuously on the rise. Every time there is a school shooting I wonder what force is so incredibly powerful that it could motivate someone to do this. What drives students so insanely berserk that they see no other way out than to shoot fellow students and then themselves? Computer Games? Guns? Religious Extremist ideas? No, that’s not it. None of these things are that powerful.

ALL the school shootings of the recent had only ONE thing in common: Psychotropic drugs.

 Loading …

I have noticed this recent pattern: Autopsies of people who were on psychotropic dugs will typically not reveal the brand names of the exact medication. If a school shooter was on Prozac or a Heath Ledger was on Zoloft, this will NOT be mentioned by the news media. It may be difficult to say that the death was caused by Zoloft specifically, it may be the drug cocktail in its entirety that had the devastating effect, but I believe that the news should openly mention what medications the person had, in this case Zoloft.

 Loading …

China’s FDA solution (comic)

Originally Posted by Patrick Valtin. 

Read and spread around this very well-written article on the hidden purposes of the Teenscreen program. The author, Sandra Lucas, is the Executive Director of the Utah Chapter of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, a mental health watchdog group. She was born in Sydney, Australia, raised on the French South Pacific island of New Caledonia. She moved to the United States at the age of 15 and has lived in Salt Lake City with her family since 1992.

Teenscreen scam : Another great educational article…

The Making of Mental Patients

Inside TeenScreen

By SANDRA LUCAS

In October, 2004, after taking TeenScreen, a 10-minute computer test developed in the psychiatric department of Columbia University, 16-year-old Chelsea Rhoades of Indiana was told she had two mental health problems, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and social anxiety disorder. The diagnoses were based upon Chelsea’s responses that she liked to help clean the house and didn’t “party” much.

Chelsea is one of countless children who get labeled with fraudulent diagnoses every day. The difference in her case is that her parents, who were unaware that TeenScreen had infiltrated their daughter’s school and had not given permission for the screening, reacted quickly. They filed a lawsuit against the officials of the high school who allowed the test to be administered and the TeenScreen program. In doing so, the Rhoades took a stand for all parents across the nation.

The unscientific nature of psychiatric labeling was admitted to by the American Psychiatric Association’s own president, Steven Sharfstein, when he stated on June 27, 2005, during an interview on the Today Show, “We do not have a clean cut lab test [for diagnosing mental illness or chemical imbalance of the brain.]”

His admission was quickly followed by another similar statement from psychiatrist Mark Graff, Chairman of the American Psychiatric Association Committee of Public Affairs, “Chemical imbalance: it’s a shorthand term really, it’s probably drug industry derived. We don’t have tests because to do it, you’d probably have to take a chunk of brain out of someone - not a good idea.” Graff did more than admit to there being no science behind the chemical imbalance theory. He also pointed out the incestuous relationship between the drug industries and psychiatry.

Modern Psychiatry (comic)
TeenScreen is definitely a child born of that union, nothing more than an unscientific written mental health survey which professes to discover “mental illnesses”, but in fact trolls for lifelong psychiatric patients in our schools. Read the rest of this entry »